Arsenal will be
pleased with their 3-0 victory over West Ham. There will no doubt be
photographs on their Twitter accounts, in their pants, half dressed, and some
in ludicrous full outfits, and there will be fans praising Arsene Wenger for
another charge up the league in the second half of a season. There will be
discussions about how Arsenal can kick on, and obviously, pundits will posit
that Arsenal are improving in the summer, and fans will start to believe that
this again could be their year.
That’s because
it’s what Arsenal do. Every year, it is the same, with little more to show for
it. From now until the end of time Arsenal will be on the cusp of something.
That is partially their own fault, and partially simply a matter of
circumstances turning football upside down. Even when civilisation crumbles,
and football no longer exists, Arsenal will be going out of the Champions
League just after the group stages, and finishing just well enough to qualify
for the next year’s tournament. The victory against West Ham showed why.
West Ham enjoyed
a bright start to the season, and deservedly so. They bought adventurously in Enner Valencia and Diafra Sakho, and with their pragmatic
loan of Alex Song they were rewarded with a calculated gamble. Stewart Downing
impressed in his new position, and while it might have been fortunate for the
side to click so swiftly, they were not lucky to be lucky. But they have
nevertheless faded, as injuries took their toll, and the players stopped playing
above their average capabilities. They will drop down the league, probably,
from now until the end of the season, but it will be remembered fondly by their
fans.
Arsenal have far
better players, and yet in the first half, they were profligate. Aaron Ramsey, Theo Walcott, Alexis Sanchez, Olivier Giroud and Mesut Ozil all had chances that more
ruthless players would have scored. Arsenal lose games that more ruthless teams
win. Arsenal draw games that more ruthless teams laugh at.
Wenger is keen
on saying that with the new stadium’s mortgage no longer prohibitive that they
can compete in the transfer market. However, there is a problem: the decade in
which they were unable to compete at the upper echelons of the market changed
the very fabric of the club. They were a finishing school for their best
players, once they grew sick of not quite winning anything, as Cesc Fabregas, Robin van Persie and others left for a better payday and a
better Wikipedia ‘honours’ subsection. They found it hard to shift the less
professional or worthwhile punts, like Nicklas Bendtner and Denilson in the
past, or, more recently, Lukas Podolski. The cliché that is often mentioned in sport
is a winners’ mentality, but with every fourth place commemorated with a
digital photograph, they were obviously little more than a bunch of losers, and
happy with it.
Look at the
clubs above them. Chelsea are stuttering and out of form, but their template
is to win the league and challenge in Europe, by whatever means necessary, no
matter how unpleasant and petty it might need to be. Manchester City, too, are far ahead because of the sheer
scale of their wealth. And that’s another problem with the 10 year holiday from
success that Arsenal took. They were replaced by City and Chelsea - better
funded, better managed, and with better players. It is not just a question of returning
to former glories; it is one of being better than they ever have been before.
They have not showed this season that there is any chance of that happening.

No comments:
Post a Comment